OUT OF CONTROL
With President Reagan hospitalized after taking a bullet to the lung, and Vice President Bush temporarily incommunicado -- Secretary of State Alexander Haig got so excited about the prospect of absolute power, his hands and face starting twitching. Alone at the top, a sweaty Alexander Haig stared into the White House Press Corps cameras and incorrectly informed the world:
"I'm in control here."
In her own "Haig Moment," Nancy "I will not impeach" Pelosi got so intoxicated thinking about her future powers, she nominated sleazeball supporter Murtha to be her number 2, and pardoned the idiot son of former President Bush for what is arguably one of the most tragic misjudgments in American history.
A higher crime and misdemeanor was hardly imaginable, yet the Not-Yet Majority Leader pardoned the latter-day President Bush before the House could even begin to unravel the falsehoods surrounding his Iraq fiasco.
"I'm in control here," ex-general Alexander Haig had said as if he had been practicing coups all his life. The 1981 quotation became widely viewed as an attempt by Haig to exceed his authority. The full, little-known, unedited Haig quote recently obtained by PNN was actually:
"Constitutionally, gentlemen, you have the president, the vice president and yours truly, the secretary of state, in that order, and should the president decide he wants to transfer the helm to our currently indisposed vice president, he will do so. As for now, I'm in control here, pending the return of our vice president, and in close touch with him should he ever return from dropping the 'kids' off at the pool."
Under the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution, when the President and Vice President are indisposed, the office holders between the Vice President and Secretary of State, namely, the Speaker of the House and the President pro tem of the Senate, resign and become acting President -- NOT the Secretary of State.
To that, Alexander Haig later reflected:
"I wasn't talking about transition in the democratic sense. I was merely talking about the executive branch, as in, 'Hey, who's running this fool government anyway?' That was the question asked. It was not, 'who is in line should Bonzo go belly-up before bedtime?'"
As it turned out, Vice President Bush had been caught with his knickers down reading a large type book, exactly as his knuckle-head son would find himself two decades later when 19 Saudi sheetheads outsmarted the most powerful man in the world. Had Haig knocked on the door to the water closet and whispered, "Mr. Vice President, you still on the throne?" the leadership crises might have been averted.
Instead, Haig declared himself leader of the free world. Haig's interpretive skills seemed more politically expedient than legal. The constitution is very clear on succession. In any succession context, taking a dump, no matter how immense the transfer, does not constitute being "indisposed."
Which brings us back to Nancy "I will not impeach" Pelosi. Months before any swearing in ceremony, indeed days before anyone knew for sure the outcome of the election, Ms. Pelosi appeared on television looking as though she had downed a case of Red Bull. And then it happened.
Out of control, drunk with power and absolutely powerless to power over it, Ms. Pelosi single-handedly removed from the table the single-most important statement made by the American people in the Midterm elections: That in spite of your unprecedented power grab, Mr. Bush, you were never beyond the long arm of justice.
With President Reagan hospitalized after taking a bullet to the lung, and Vice President Bush temporarily incommunicado -- Secretary of State Alexander Haig got so excited about the prospect of absolute power, his hands and face starting twitching. Alone at the top, a sweaty Alexander Haig stared into the White House Press Corps cameras and incorrectly informed the world:
"I'm in control here."
In her own "Haig Moment," Nancy "I will not impeach" Pelosi got so intoxicated thinking about her future powers, she nominated sleazeball supporter Murtha to be her number 2, and pardoned the idiot son of former President Bush for what is arguably one of the most tragic misjudgments in American history.
A higher crime and misdemeanor was hardly imaginable, yet the Not-Yet Majority Leader pardoned the latter-day President Bush before the House could even begin to unravel the falsehoods surrounding his Iraq fiasco.
"I'm in control here," ex-general Alexander Haig had said as if he had been practicing coups all his life. The 1981 quotation became widely viewed as an attempt by Haig to exceed his authority. The full, little-known, unedited Haig quote recently obtained by PNN was actually:
"Constitutionally, gentlemen, you have the president, the vice president and yours truly, the secretary of state, in that order, and should the president decide he wants to transfer the helm to our currently indisposed vice president, he will do so. As for now, I'm in control here, pending the return of our vice president, and in close touch with him should he ever return from dropping the 'kids' off at the pool."
Under the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution, when the President and Vice President are indisposed, the office holders between the Vice President and Secretary of State, namely, the Speaker of the House and the President pro tem of the Senate, resign and become acting President -- NOT the Secretary of State.
To that, Alexander Haig later reflected:
"I wasn't talking about transition in the democratic sense. I was merely talking about the executive branch, as in, 'Hey, who's running this fool government anyway?' That was the question asked. It was not, 'who is in line should Bonzo go belly-up before bedtime?'"
As it turned out, Vice President Bush had been caught with his knickers down reading a large type book, exactly as his knuckle-head son would find himself two decades later when 19 Saudi sheetheads outsmarted the most powerful man in the world. Had Haig knocked on the door to the water closet and whispered, "Mr. Vice President, you still on the throne?" the leadership crises might have been averted.
Instead, Haig declared himself leader of the free world. Haig's interpretive skills seemed more politically expedient than legal. The constitution is very clear on succession. In any succession context, taking a dump, no matter how immense the transfer, does not constitute being "indisposed."
Which brings us back to Nancy "I will not impeach" Pelosi. Months before any swearing in ceremony, indeed days before anyone knew for sure the outcome of the election, Ms. Pelosi appeared on television looking as though she had downed a case of Red Bull. And then it happened.
Out of control, drunk with power and absolutely powerless to power over it, Ms. Pelosi single-handedly removed from the table the single-most important statement made by the American people in the Midterm elections: That in spite of your unprecedented power grab, Mr. Bush, you were never beyond the long arm of justice.
8 Comments:
As much as I want Bush to twist slowly, slowly in the wind, I am not for impeachment. It would make the Democrats seem merely vindictive and would consume too much of the time and the resources we should instead commit to reversing the damage W has already done. We will have to leave it to history to render its verdict. I like to tell people when the final history is written on this administration, it will look like just a comma.
r
dear r:
one would have to be in a coma to think Bush was merely a comma. tell that to the tens of thousands of dead. for them it will be a very long period.
I hate that feeling when your skivvies have you in an ankle lock and the world moves beneath your feet.
It is a given that history will judge Bush, as it does every tyrant. That would have occured had the opposition done nothing. What Democrats won in the congressional elections is the right to judge Bush before that history itself becomes history.
Yes, anonymous, the Democrats did win the "right to justice". Prudence, however, needs to take hold. Plans put in place. Not rush headlong into an event (as Bush himself did) that could easily occupy the next two + years. We still need to:
Get the troops home.
Restore our good will among nations.
Raise the minimum wage.
Acknowledge global warming.
Do something about it.
Tackle the healthcare crisis.
Bring a Democrat to the White House.
Rebuild New Orleans.
After all of the above is accomplished, THEN we can think about retribution. --USCE
usce:
How do u propose to get your laundry list of things done without threat of impeachment? You've folded your hand. The president still has the veto pen and congress has no real power except as an investigative body.
Of course, threat! Even lie about how close we are to it. But just between you and me, don't waste our time.
Nancy has dangled a carrot and if GW doesn't take it, then it's saber rattling time. --USCE
PS. Congress is not limited to the power of an "ivestigative body". It also holds the purse strings and funding for his folly may finally come up short. --USCE
Post a Comment
<< Home